In our April legal update we provided commentary on temporary changes to the insolvency/bankruptcy regimes in the Corporations Act and Bankruptcy Act that were implemented to assist businesses and individuals navigate through Covid-19.
One of the changes was a new, temporary, ‘safe harbour’ provision so that the directors of a company that incur a debt while the company is insolvent (or the company becomes insolvent as a result of incurring the debt) will not contravene the Corporations Act and those directors will not contravene their personal duty to avoid insolvent trading. This temporary safe harbour that was to originally expire in September 2020, but has now been extended to 31 December 2020.
However, notwithstanding the extension to the safe harbour period, directors will need to be aware of the wording of the temporary ‘safe harbour’, particularly paragraph (3) set out below, and a director’s ability to rely on the safe harbour.
The temporary safe harbour provides that subsection 588G(2) of the Corporations Act (which is the duty on a director to avoid insolvent trading) does not apply in relation to a person and a debt incurred by a company if the debt is incurred:
- in the ordinary course of the company’s business; and
- during the period commencing on 25 March 2020 and ending when the temporary safe harbour is revoked (which is currently expected to be 31 December 2020); and
- before any appointment during that period of an administrator, or liquidator, of the company.
Therefore, the wording of this safe harbour provision appears to suggest that, in addition to satisfying paragraphs (1) and (2), to rely on the safe harbour an administrator or liquidator must be appointed by the directors prior to the end of the safe harbour period. That is, the safe harbour will not apply, and directors of the company could still be liable for debts incurred during the safe harbour period, unless an administrator or liquidator is appointed prior to the end of the safe harbour period.
Please get in touch with the Sierra Legal team if you have any queries.
Other articles you may be interested in
Pre-Transaction Conduct and Liability for Misleading and Deceptive Conduct
Two recent decisions reinforce that liability for misleading and deceptive conduct under the Australian Consumer Law can arise well before binding transaction documents are signed by the parties. If your business issues tender documents, information memoranda or due diligence materials, this article is relevant to you.
Read More.Planning to Sell? How a Share Sale Became a Forced Exit — and What Every Seller Should Learn From It
They set out to sell part of their stake in Melbourne Airport. They ended up losing all of it. If you hold shares in a company with a shareholders' agreement and you're planning to sell those shares, there are clauses that could cost you far more than the deal you're trying to do — and a recent court decision shows exactly how.
Read More.Sierra Legal Named Australia's Most Innovative Corporate & Commercial Law Firm for 2026
Sierra Legal has been named 'Most Innovative Corporate & Commercial Law Firm 2026 – Australia' at the APAC Legal Awards, run by APAC Insider. It's a reflection of the work that happens behind the scenes every day across M&A, corporate transactions and commercial legal matters.
Read More.